In its strictest meaning, the
democracy is an organizational form of state that is characterized by the
exercise of popular will, in which collective decisions are taken by the legal
representatives elected by the people, through certain mechanisms of
participation, who give them the powers necessary to perform that function.
Based on the thought of Aristotle in ancient Greece, and supposedly conceived,
in its simplest version, as "government of the people, by the people and
for the people" with the purpose of opposing to organizations or states
that intended to conserve and / or manage the political power by authoritarian
principles such as absolutism, autocracy, despotism, dictatorship or
totalitarianism, among others, manifestly contrary to the rights and freedoms
inherent in the human condition, finds in the weaknesses of our kind, faithful
the aphorism popularized by Thomas Hobbes "Homo homini lupus", its
main handicap. The selfishness, that is in the beginning of much the human
behavior, is a major factor that contributes to alter, and even destroy,
coexistence among the people and the core values that the political theory of
democracy represents: the freedom, the equality, the personnel rights, the
pluralism, the tolerance, the participation and the opinion.
When, as is the case of a significant
part of the current political establishment, democratic mechanisms are used
surreptitiously to reach the power, using public resources to their own
advantage, practicing the nepotism and corruption in its entirety and promoting
economic cultura of personal achievement, making a disastrous management and
fleecing the government coffers, with all impunity, defrauding the trust of
citizens, especially of those who, with his vote, toward his election, we are
not in the backroom of democracy, but in the themselves sewers of the same. In this situation, the theoretical benefits
that may derive from the democratic system are automatically canceled and,
democracy itself, in addition to not providing solutions, becomes the problem.
Already, in his time, the famous Indian leader, Mahatma Gandhi, with his
popular wisdom, considered the "politics without principles" as the
first of the seven factors he saw as more destructive to human beings.
The full exercise of
democracy can bring to many people the progress and social harmony, but is
falsified and prostituted when only is
used as a flag and not is practiced, except to justify personal interests, or
group, with total disregard for the rest of citizen. An example of this we have
in the successive strikes of workers who, for various reasons and
circumstances, have been organized in our country, Spain, and, at present, are
being especially hard in the fields of mining and transport in Asturias. Without
going into the reasons for them, or what it is de same, in the funds, that can
be understandable and justifiable, what is not acceptable, because is
completely and utterly reprehensible, are the forms. How can
be justify that trying to defend or vindicate the rights of some are
violated, flagrantly, the rights of others who, also, have not any guilt? How can you accept that someone tries to
intimidate, and even attack, to those people who want to use their freedom to
exercise their legitimate right to work, or to try to hinder the mobility of
those who, for one reason or another, have the need to travel, blocking roads
and railways? How can tolerate that picketing strikers, euphemistically called
informative, carrying away with violence, can damage vehicles, buildings,
street furniture and everything in its path, while manifest with strong
criticism for the actions of security forces that only trying to prevent its excesses? In the name
of what right? In what exercise the
freedom? Do not think it is necessary to
recall nobody that the boundary of our rights and freedoms ends where they
begin the rights and freedoms of others.
In my case, in that I
have never had political ambitions, nor am I related to any party, being
interested in the issue just enough so it affects me as a citizen, having been
born, grown up, studied, raised a family and having practiced the profession of
engineering for several previous years
in the Franco regime, in no time I felt the insecurity that currently live, or
economic uncertainty and personal anxiety that many people feel and suffer for
the absence the future employment prospects. Neither can see that the
fundamental pillars of the state, such as education, health and justice, apart
from the best technical resources available, which are obviously the product of
the normal development of technology and not outcome the specific work of their
managers, have been demonstrably improved. The same can be said of the family,
as the foundation of society, in which the loss of core values that
characterize it is clearly worrying, with very uncertain future.
Not that I have a
negative personality or chronic pessimism, what happens is that what I now see
do not like, and what I suspect may come in the future does not seem to be
better. If there is not a radical change, and this process comes sooner rather
than later, many of those who have lived what some call "repressive
dictatorship", may end up wanting
to return to those times.
C. Díaz Fdez.
Oviedo, June 11, 2012
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Agradezco tus comentarios y/o sugerencias